Hi Graham,
Love the post! 
Getting all the subspecies checklist data correct has been a bear from day-one. So all subspecies share the same location data as all their parent species. That is changing slowly. Our subspecies location/checklist data is improving monthly. And, with the import of new data sources, we hope to be close to perfect worldwide in a few months.
With that said, if I am recording sightings at the subspecfic level, I don't find it a problem to use the Include subspecies checkbox. Even though all subspecies will be shown, it is easy enough to check the one I intend and ignore the others. Do you find this not to be the case?
Alternatives for this might be:
- Do not use Include subspecies and when you want to mark a sighting for a subspecies in the checklist entry window, use the Add Name button to quickly add that subspecies to the checklist and check it off.
- In the Sightings Entry Setup window, check both "Include subspecies" and "Show only things sighted at this location". This way you will get all the species and subspecies that you have recorded sightings for at this location; filtering out the subspecies never seen before as well as species. Then, if you have seen a new bird, again use the Add Name button to quickly add it to the checklist window and check it off.
Let me know what you think about this. Good question though and one many users can learn from.
Jeff |